Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rebecca Munk Mortensen vs Magdalini Adaloglou Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mortensen vs Adaloglou analysis and find out who is favored!
Rebecca Munk Mortensen vs Magdalini Adaloglou Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mortensen 1 - 0 Adaloglou
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mortensen has won 46.01% of points on their second serve, while Adaloglou has won 49.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mortensen, in recent form, has won 59.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adaloglou has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.79% and 29.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mortensen has saved 56.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adaloglou has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mortensen has won 67.24% of matches played (W/L 39/ 19), with Adaloglou winning 33.33% (W/L 3/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mortensen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 32/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4). Adaloglou has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 27/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mortensen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14), where as Adaloglou has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mortensen winning 1 times and Adaloglou being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mortensen winning 2 and Adaloglou winning 0. The last match between Mortensen and Adaloglou was at the W15 Monastir, 31-01-2024, First, Hard with Rebecca Munk Mortensen getting the victory 6-0 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mortensen and Adaloglou have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mortensen winning 0 times and Adaloglou 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mortensen winning 0, and Adaloglou 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mortensen has played against opponents with an average rank of 161.62 while Adaloglou has played against players with an average rank of 172.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mortensen has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adaloglou has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mortensen has converted 61.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adaloglou has converted 31.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
584
Rank
584
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
63% (54-32)
Career Total W/L
55% (40-33)
70% (21-9)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rebecca Munk Mortensen vs Magdalini Adaloglou For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mortensen VS Adaloglou
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Rebecca Munk Mortensen | Magdalini Adaloglou |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 8 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:33:0 | 0:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (13/24) | 52% (11/21) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 92% (12/13) | 27% (3/11) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (4/11) | 20% (2/10) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 76% (16/21) | 33% (8/24) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
32
Total Points Won
13
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rebecca Munk Mortensen | Magdalini Adaloglou |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (21/9) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (45/21) | 50% (6/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (345/238) | 47% (52/58) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 83% (15/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:54 | 1:6:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 117.03 | 156.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1059/1824) | 60% (126/209) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (674/1059) | 56% (71/126) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (352/765) | 49% (41/83) |
| BPs Won% Total | 61% (135/221) | 31% (5/16) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (837/1671) | 36% (77/212) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (11/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (23/21) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (23/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Rebecca Munk Mortensen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Julia Orswall
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
17 of
27)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
24 of
27)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiia Firman
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Gabriela Vilar
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
4 of
25)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Louise Brunskog
55%
(
48 of
87)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Jana Otzipka
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
14
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Magdalini Adaloglou Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
32
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalini Adaloglou
Player
Rikke De Koning
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Magdalini Adaloglou
Player
Julie Belgraver
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lara Salden
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
42
Total Points Won
36
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nelise Verster
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Smith
Player
Magdalini Adaloglou
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mortensen Vs Adaloglou Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mortensen are available here and Adaloglou photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
